Marcel's SOA & BPM blog - Alle commentaar

re: Determining the optimum number of BizTalk Hosts

Marcel Fernee — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:16:54 GMT

@Stefan

You can dedicated hosts on the same machine for batching vs. messaging. When you have one host that is busy with a batch, the messaging host can still process messages. The same is true for prioritization. You can have a host that is busy with losts of low priority messages and a host that occasionally receives a high priority message. That high priority message will get processed, regardless how busy the 'low priority'-host is.

However. When the batch-host and the low priority host consume a lot of resources (memory, io, etc.) the high priority host may not get enough resources to do its job. To be absolutely sure you should place the high priority host on a dedicated server (either physical or virtual).

re: Determining the optimum number of BizTalk Hosts

Stefan — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:26:21 GMT

Your article seems interesting, but uncomplete, how do you separate hosts for doing Prioritization and or Batching vs. messaging.

Do you need at least two servers to do so?

re: Wow

Steef-Jan Wiggers — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:24:28 GMT

Nou dan zal ik zeker er naar toe gaan!

Buzz on the Blogsphere

PDC2008 — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:42:47 GMT

Noise is elevating with the posting of new sessions on August 1st. Brad Abrams highlights sessions and

web services asmx

web services asmx — Tue, 20 May 2008 06:41:06 GMT

Pingback from web services asmx

nu element

nu element — Sat, 10 May 2008 12:58:57 GMT

Pingback from nu element

re: Introductie

André — Wed, 07 May 2008 19:46:07 GMT

Succes Marcel!

re: Introductie

Bart Wessels — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:22:38 GMT

Good luck with your Blog Macel!

I like the fact that you start blogging..

Bart